4.7 Article

Functional evidence for the expression of P2X1, P2X4 and P2X7 receptors in human lung mast cells

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 157, 期 7, 页码 1215-1224

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00287.x

关键词

mast cells; human; lung; LAD2; P2X1 receptors; P2X4 receptors; P2X7 receptors; ATP; ivermectin; AZ11645373

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: P2X receptors are widely expressed in cells of the immune system with varying functions. This study sought to characterize P2X receptor expression in the LAD2 human mast cell line and human lung mast cells (HLMCs). Experimental approach: Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and patch clamp studies were used to characterize P2X expression in mast cells using a range of pharmacological tools. Key results: RT-PCR revealed P2X1, P2X4 and P2X7 transcripts in both cell types; mRNA for P2X6 was also detected in LAD2 cells. Under whole-cell patch clamp conditions, rapid application of ATP (1-1000 mu M) to cells clamped at -60 mV consistently evoked inward currents in both types of cells. Brief application of ATP (1 s) evoked a rapidly desensitizing P2X1-like current in both cell types. This current was also elicited by alpha beta methylene ATP (10 mu M, 94% cells, n = 31) and was antagonized in LAD2 cells by NF 449 (1 mu M) and pyridoxal phosphate-6-azo(benzene-2,4-disulphonic acid) (1-10 mu M). A P2X7-like non-desensitizing current in response to high concentrations of ATP (1-5 mM) was also seen in both cell types (96% LAD2, n = 24; 54% HLMCs, n = 24) which was antagonized by AZ11645373 (1 mu M). P2X7-like responses were also evoked in LAD2 cells by 2'(3')-0-(4-benzoylbenzoyl)ATP (300 mu M). A P2X4-like current was evoked by 100 mu M ATP (80% LAD2, n = 10; 21% HLMCs, n = 29), the amplitude and duration of which was potentiated by ivermectin (3 mu M). Conclusion and implications: Our data confirmed the presence of functional P2X1, P2X4 and P2X7 receptors in LAD2 cells and HLMCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据