4.7 Article

Non-genomic effect of testosterone on airway smooth muscle

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 149, 期 8, 页码 1083-1091

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706936

关键词

airway smooth muscle; testosterone; epithelium; non genomic pathway; rabbit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: Recent studies on blood vessels have provided evidence that testosterone may exert direct effects on smooth muscle. However, an acute effect on airway reactivity has not been shown yet. The aim of this study was to assess the direct effect of testosterone on the responsiveness of male adult rabbit airway smooth muscle (ASM), precontracted with 10 mu M acetylcholine, 10 mu M carbachol or 80 mM KCl. Experimental approach: Contractility studies of rabbit tracheal smooth muscle were performed. Key results: Testosterone at concentrations of or above 1 nM had a significant relaxant effect on ASM precontracted with acetylcholine or carbachol, but did not affect ASM precontracted with KCl. The mechanical removal of airway epithelium as well as the inhibition of NO synthetase (by 100 mu M L-NAME) reduced the relaxation caused by testosterone. The effect of testosterone was not altered by impairing prostanoid synthesis (by 10mM indomethacin). The nitric oxide donor, sodium nitroprusside, had the same relaxant effect on ASM precontracted with either carbachol or KCl. Inhibitors of androgen receptors (10mM flutamide) or DNA transcription (100mM actinomycin D) did not alter the effect of testosterone. Prolonged incubation of ASM with 100 nM or 100 mM testosterone for 24 or 48 h did not alter their responsiveness to acetylcholine. BSAtestosterone (1pM to 100nM) relaxed significantly ASM precontracted with carbachol. The mechanical removal of airway epithelium abolished the relaxant effect of BSA-testosterone. Conclusions and implications: Testosterone relaxes precontracted ASM via an epithelium and NO-mediated way. This effect is mediated via a non-genomic pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据