4.7 Article

Inhibition of the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current in ventricular myocytes by angiotensin II via the AT1 receptor

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 154, 期 2, 页码 429-439

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/bjp.2008.95

关键词

angiotensin II; ion channels; action potentials; ventricle; receptors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: There is increasing evidence that angiotensin II (Ang II) is associated with the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. However, little is known about the electrophysiological effects of Ang II on ventricular repolarization. The rapid component of the delayed rectifier K+ current (I-Kr) plays a critical role in cardiac repolarization. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of Ang II on IKr in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. Experimental approach: The whole-cell patch-clamp technique was used to record I-Kr in native cardiocytes and in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, co-transfected with human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) encoding the alpha-subunit of I-Kr and the human Ang II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor gene. Key results: Ang II decreased the amplitude of I-Kr in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 of 8.9 nM. Action potential durations at 50% (APD(50)) and 90% (APD(90)) repolarization were prolonged 20% and 16%, respectively by Ang II ( 100 nM). Ang II-induced inhibition of the I-Kr was abolished by the AT(1) receptor blocker, losartan (1 mu M). Ang II decreased hERG current in HEK293 cells and significantly delayed channel activation, deactivation and recovery from inactivation. Moreover, PKC inhibitors, stausporine and Bis-1, significantly attenuated Ang II-induced inhibition of I-Kr. Conclusions and implications: Ang II produces an inhibitory effect on I-Kr/hERG currents via AT(1) receptors linked to the PKC pathway in ventricular myocytes. This is a potential mechanism by which elevated levels of Ang II are involved in the occurrence of arrhythmias in cardiac hypertrophy and failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据