4.7 Article

Effects of genistein aglycone in osteoporotic, ovariectomized rats: a comparison with alendronate, raloxifene and oestradiol

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 155, 期 6, 页码 896-905

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/bjp.2008.305

关键词

genistein; menopause; osteoporosis; alendronate; raloxifene; oestradiol

资金

  1. Francesco Squadrito
  2. Primus Pharmaceuticals Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: Genistein aglycone positively affects bone loss in postmenopausal women, but bone quality data are still lacking. To clarify this, we investigated the effects of genistein compared with alendronate, raloxifene and oestradiol in an animal model of established osteoporosis. Experimental approach: Six months after ovariectomy, 96 ovariectomized (OVX) rats were divided into 8 equal groups, randomized to treatments (genistein aglycone (1 and 10mgkg(-1) s.c.); alendronate (0.003 and 0.03mgkg(-1) s.c.); raloxifene hydrochloride (0.05 and 0.5mgkg(-1) s.c.); 17-alpha-ethinyl oestradiol (0.003 and 0.03mgkg(-1) s.c.)) for 12 weeks. Untreated OVX (n = 12) and sham OVX (n = 12) were used as controls. At the beginning and end of treatment, bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) were assessed. At the end of the experiment, calcium, phosphorus, bone-alkaline phosphatase (b-ALP), collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), osteoprotegerin (OPG) and soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (sRANKL) were assayed. Femurs were removed and tested for breaking strength and histology. Key results: Genistein (10mgkg(-1)) showed a greater increase in both BMD (P < 0.0001 vs OVX) and BMC than all the other treatments. Moreover, genistein significantly increased breaking strength, bone quality, b-ALP (P < 0.0001 vs OVX) and OPG, and reduced CTX and sRANKL compared with the other treatments at all dose levels. Conclusions and implications: The results strongly suggest that the genistein aglycone might be a new therapy for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据