4.4 Article

Characterization of River Natural Organic Matter by High-Performance Size Exclusion Chromatography

期刊

ANALYTICAL LETTERS
卷 48, 期 18, 页码 2936-2946

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2015.1060601

关键词

Molecular weight; High-performance size exclusion chromatography; Natural organic matters

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea grant - Korean Government (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology) [NRF-2014R1A1A2007515]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular weight of natural organic matter from the Yeongsan and Seomjin Rivers and the discharge from the wastewater treatment plants were analyzed for seasonal characteristics by high-performance size exclusion chromatography. The distribution of molecular weights demonstrated relationships with microbial activity and seasonal variations with temperature. Dissolved organic carbon and total organic carbon for the Seomjin River were from 1.6 to 3.1mgL(-1); for the Yeongsan River system, these parameters were between 2.0 and 8.0mgL(-1). There were no significant differences between upstream and downstream organic matter. The biochemical oxygen demand (0.8-2.5mgL(-1)) for the Seomjin River was less than the chemical oxygen demand (2.9-5.0mgL(-1)). Similarly, the biochemical oxygen demand (0.9-4.6mgL(-1)) for the Yeongsan River was lower than the chemical oxygen demand (3.8-10.6mgL(-1)). The molecular weight of aromatic compounds increased as the water temperature decreased in October, whereas the molecular weights of proteins decreased as the water temperature increased. These results suggest that as microbial activity increased, natural organic matter with a smaller molecular weight may be employed as an energy source by microorganisms. As a result, seasonal variation of the water temperature may influence the distribution of organic matter in the rivers based on molecular weight and microbial activity such that the smaller natural organic matter was more readily degraded by microorganisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据