4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Quantitative assessment of optic nerve head morphology and retinal nerve fibre layer in nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy with optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoloscopy

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 93, 期 6, 页码 731-735

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.143297

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/aims: To compare the optic disc parameters between patients with non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) and normal controls, using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph III (HRT), and to evaluate the structure-function relationship in NAION eyes. Methods: Both eyes of 22 patients with typical unilateral NAION of >= 6 months' duration and 52 eyes from 52 randomly selected normal subjects underwent Humphrey visual field (HVF) examination and measurement of optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFLT). Results: For the NAION-affected eyes, NAION fellow eyes and normal controls, the ocular magnification-corrected OCT disc areas were respectively 1.849 (SD 0.343) mm(2), 1.809 (0.285) mm(2) and 1.964 (0.386) mm(2); the cup areas were 0.246 (0.187) mm(2), 0.172 (0.180) mm(2) and 0.469 (0.332) mm(2). On HRT, the disc areas were 2.11 (0.38) mm(2), 2.06 (0.40) mm(2) and 2.16 (0.42) mm(2); and the cup areas were 0.28 (0.34) mm(2), 0.25 (0.18) mm(2) and 0.48 (0.32) mm(2). On both OCT and HRT, the cup areas and cup-disc area ratios (CDAR) of both eyes of NAION patients were significantly smaller than controls (p <= 0.01), but the disc areas were not (p >= 0.21). There was a significant correlation between HVF mean deviation and OCT RNFLT (r = 0.44, p = 0.04) but not with HRT RNFLT (p = 0.30) in NAION-affected eyes. Conclusion: NAION patients have smaller optic cups and CDARs in both eyes compared with controls. A larger sample size is necessary to demonstrate if disc size affects the risk of developing NAION. The NAION-affected eyes' OCT RNFLT correlated with HVF mean deviation but the HRT RNFLT did not.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据