4.4 Article

Effect of type of TAG fatty acids on lutein and zeaxanthin bioavailability

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 110, 期 1, 页码 1-10

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114512004813

关键词

Xanthophyll; Bioavailability; SFA; Unsaturated fatty acids

资金

  1. DGS (Ministry of Health)
  2. Mederic
  3. Ipsen
  4. MGEN
  5. SODEXHO
  6. Pierre Fabre
  7. ANR [ANR-05-PNRA-010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The xanthophylls lutein and zeaxanthin probably play a role in visual function and may participate in the prevention of age-related eye diseases. Although a minimum amount of TAG is required for an optimal bioavailability of these carotenoids, the effect of the type of TAG fatty acids (FA) is less clear. The aim was to assess the effect of the type of TAG FA on bioavailability of these xanthophylls. A total of three complementary models were used: an in vitro digestion model to study bioaccessibility, Caco-2 cells to study uptake efficiency and orally administered rats to study in vivo bioavailability. Results showed that lutein and zeaxanthin bioaccessibility was greater (about 20-30%, P < 0.05) with butter and palm oil than with olive and fish oils. Mixed micelle size, which was significantly lower (about 8%, P<0.05) with SFA than with unsaturated FA, was inversely related to lutein and zeaxanthin bioaccessibility. There was no significant effect of the type of TAG FA on xanthophyll uptake by Caco-2 cells, but some compounds present in natural oils significantly affected xanthophyll uptake. Oral administration of rats with spinach and butter over 3 d led to a higher fasting plasma lutein concentration than oral administration with olive or fish oils. In conclusion, dietary fats rich in SFA lead to a higher bioavailability of lutein and zeaxanthin, as compared with fats rich in MUFA and PUFA. This is due partly to the higher bioaccessibility of these xanthophylls in the smaller mixed micelles produced when SFA are incorporated into mixed micelles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据