4.4 Article

Repetition counts: repeated exposure increases intake of a novel vegetable in UK pre-school children compared to flavour-flavour and flavour-nutrient learning

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 109, 期 11, 页码 2089-2097

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114512004126

关键词

Repeated exposure; Vegetable intake; Learning mechanisms; Pre-school children

资金

  1. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [245012-HabEat]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Children are not consuming sufficient amounts of fruits and vegetables in their habitual diet. Methods derived from associative learning theories could be effective at promoting vegetable intake in pre-school children. The objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of different learning strategies in promoting the intake of a novel vegetable. Children aged between 9 and 38 months were recruited from UK nurseries. The children (n 72) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (repeated exposure, flavour-flavour learning or flavour-nutrient learning). Each child was offered ten exposures to their respective version of a novel vegetable (artichoke). Pre- and post-intervention measures of artichoke puree and carrot puree (control vegetable) intake were taken. At pre-intervention, carrot intake was significantly higher than artichoke intake (P<0.05). Intake of both vegetables increased over time (P<0.001); however, when changes in intake were investigated, artichoke intake increased significantly more than carrot intake (P<0.001). Artichoke intake increased to the same extent in all three conditions, and this effect was persistent up to 5 weeks post-intervention. Five exposures were sufficient to increase intake compared to the first exposure (P<0.001). Repeated exposure to three variants of a novel vegetable was sufficient to increase intake of this vegetable, regardless of the addition of a familiar taste or energy. Repetition is therefore a critical factor for promoting novel vegetable intake in pre-school children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据