4.4 Article

Responses in digestion, rumen fermentation and microbial populations to inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analogue

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 108, 期 3, 页码 482-491

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114511005794

关键词

Rumen; Methane; Hydrogen; Bromochloromethane; Goats

资金

  1. National Agriculture and Food Research Organisation (NARO), Japan
  2. Australian Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Meat and Livestock Australia
  3. Australian Wool Innovation Limited
  4. Dairy Australia
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23580377] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of the anti-methanogenic compound, bromochloromethane (BCM), on rumen microbial fermentation and ecology were examined in vivo. Japanese goats were fed a diet of 50% Timothy grass and 50% concentrate and then sequentially adapted to low, mid and high doses of BCM. The goats were placed into the respiration chambers for analysis of rumen microbial function and methane and H-2 production. The levels of methane production were reduced by 5, 71 and 91%, and H-2 production was estimated at 545, 2941 and 3496 mmol/head per d, in response to low, mid and high doses of BCM, respectively, with no effect on maintenance feed intake and digestibility. Real-time PCR quantification of microbial groups showed a significant decrease relative to controls in abundance of methanogens and rumen fungi, whereas there were increases in Prevotella spp. and Fibrobacter succinogenes, a decrease in Ruminococcus albus and R. flavefaciens was unchanged. The numbers of protozoa were also unaffected. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and quantitative PCR analysis revealed that several Prevotella spp. were the bacteria that increased most in response to BCM treatment. It is concluded that the methane-inhibited rumen adapts to high hydrogen levels by shifting fermentation to propionate via Prevotella spp., but the majority of metabolic hydrogen is expelled as H-2 gas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据