4.4 Article

Effects of soya isoflavones and exercise on body composition and clinical risk factors of cardiovascular diseases in overweight postmenopausal women: a 6-month double-blind controlled trial

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 105, 期 8, 页码 1199-1209

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114510004897

关键词

Menopause; Fat mass; Lean body mass; Bone mineral density; C-reactive protein

资金

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Results from a pilot project indicate that isoflavones and exercise could have an additive effect on body composition and clinical risk factors of CVD in postmenopausal women. The objective of the present study was to assess the combined effect of exercise and isoflavones in overweight-to-obese postmenopausal women. In this double-blind randomised controlled trial, 100 overweight-to-obese (BMI 29.9 (SD 3.2) kg/m(2)) postmenopausal women were assigned to four groups: (1) placebo (PLA); (2) isoflavones (ISO); (3) exercise and placebo (Ex + PLA); (4) exercise and isoflavones (Ex + ISO). The supplementation contained 70 mg/d of isoflavones. Exercise consisted of three weekly sessions of resistance training and aerobics. Outcome measures included fat mass (FM), lean body mass (LBM), bone mineral density, lipid profile, fasting glucose, fasting insulin and insulin resistance (homeostasis assessment model). The main effects of exercise were observed for total FM (P=0.02), FM% (P<0.01), trunk FM% (P=0.05), arm FM% (P<0.01), leg FM% (P=0.02), arm LBM (P<0.01), leg LBM (P=0.02) and C-reactive protein (P<0.01). A main effect was detected for isoflavones in improving leg FM% (P=0.05). No interactions were observed between isoflavones and exercise. In conclusion, it was observed that 6 months of exercise brought favourable changes in total FM, FM% and LBM in overweight postmenopausal women. No synergistic effects were observed between exercise and isoflavones. However, isoflavones could have a beneficial effect on leg FM%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据