4.4 Article

Lymphatic absorption of α-linolenic acid in rats fed flaxseed oil-based emulsion

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 105, 期 7, 页码 1026-1035

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S000711451000454X

关键词

Emulsion; Intestinal lipid absorption; Lymphatic lipids; Flaxseed oil; alpha-Linolenic acid bioavailability

资金

  1. National Association of Technical Research
  2. Aquitaine Regional Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bioavailability of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) from flaxseed oil in an emulsified form v. a non-emulsified form was investigated by using two complementary approaches: the first one dealt with the characterisation of the flaxseed oil emulsion in in vitro gastrointestinal-like conditions; the second one compared the intestinal absorption of ALA in rats fed the two forms of the oil. The in vitro study on emulsified flaxseed oil showed that decreasing the pH from 7.3 to 1.5 at the physiological temperature (37 degrees C) induced instantaneous oil globule coalescence. Some phase separation was observed under acidic conditions that vanished after further neutralisation. The lecithin used to stabilise the emulsions inhibited TAG hydrolysis by pancreatic lipase. In contrast, lipid solubilisation by bile salts (after lipase and phospholipase hydrolysis) was favoured by preliminary oil emulsification. The in vivo absorption of ALA in thoracic lymph duct-cannulated rats fed flaxseed oil, emulsified or non-emulsified, was quantified. Oil emulsification significantly favoured the rate and extent of ALA recovery as measured by the maximum ALA concentration in the lymph (C-max = 14 mg/ml at 3 h in the emulsion group v. 9 mg/ml at 5 h in the oil group; P < 0.05). Likewise, the area under the curve of the kinetics was significantly higher in the emulsion group (48 mg x h/ml for rats fed emulsion v. 26 mg x h/ml for rats fed oil; P < 0.05). On the whole, ALA bioavailability was improved with flaxseed oil ingested in an emulsified state. Data obtained from the in vitro studies helped to partly interpret the physiological results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据