4.4 Article

Food, energy and macronutrient contribution of out-of-home foods in school-going adolescents in Cotonou, Benin

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 103, 期 2, 页码 281-288

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114509991668

关键词

Out-of-home foods; School-going adolescents; Urban Benin

资金

  1. Nutrition Third World
  2. Belgian non-profit organisation
  3. Belgian Development Cooperation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of the present study was to document the food, energy and macronutrient contribution Of out-of-home prepared foods in school-going adolescents in Cotonou (Benin) and compare the food, energy and macronutrient intakes of low and high out-of-home consumers. We used a cross-sectional study with 24 h dietary recalls oil two non-consecutive school days to collect food intake data. Low and high consumers were defined respectively as subjects whose percentage of daily energy intake front out-of-home foods was in the first and the third terciles of the sample distribution. The setting was twelve secondary schools in Cotonou with 656 adolescents aged 13-19 years. Out-of-home prepared foods contributed m,ore than 40 % of the daily energy, fat, protein, carbohydrate and fibre intakes and of the daily weight of food in the adolescents. They were highly present at breakfast and as afternoon snacks in high consumers, providing respectively 94 and 82 % of the energy intake of high consumers at breakfast and as afternoon snacks. Low consumers ate more fruit and vegetables and cereal grain product,; than high consumers whereas high consumers consumed more sweet energy-dense foods. Both categories had a diet poor in fruit and vegetables (hardly one-fourth of the recommended 400 g) and high in fat. We concluded that out-of-home foods are important in the diet of urban school adolescents in Benin. Therefore, they should be investigated in depth and taken into account in the development of interventions to promote healthy diet and lifestyles in adolescents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据