4.4 Article

Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and adaptation to chronic hypoxia alter acyl composition of serum and heart lipids

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 102, 期 9, 页码 1297-1307

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114509389242

关键词

Dietary n-3 and n-6 PUFA; Chronic hypoxia; Serum and heart lipids; Antioxidative enzymes; Conjugated dienes; Cardioprotection

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [0021620858]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [305/07/0875]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of dietary supplementation with fat of different fatty acid profile and chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) on the fatty acid composition of serum and heart lipids were analysed. Adult male Wistar rats were fed a standard non-fat diet enriched with 10% of lard, fish oil (n-3 PUFA) or maize oil (n-6 PUFA) for 10 weeks. After 4 weeks on the diets, each group was divided in two subgroups, either exposed to CIH in a barochamber (7000 m, twenty-five exposures) or kept at normoxia. In normoxic rats, the fish oil diet increased the level of conjugated dienes. The n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio in serum TAG, phospholipids (PL), cholesteryl esters (CE) and heart TAG, PL and diacylglycerols (DAG) followed the ratio in the fed diet (in the sequence maize oil > lard > fish oil). In heart TAG, PL and DAG, 20 : 4n-6 and 18: 2n-6 were replaced by 22 : 6n-3 in the fish oil group. The main fatty acid in CE was 20:4n-6 in the lard and maize oil groups whereas in the fish oil group, half of 20: 4n-6 was replaced by 20: 5n-3. CIH further increased 20: 5n-3 in CE in the fish oil group. CIH decreased the n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio in serum CE, heart TAG, PL and DAG in all dietary groups and stimulated the activity of catalase in the maize and fish oil groups. In conclusion, PUFA diets and CIH, both interventions considered to be cardioprotective, distinctly modified the fatty acid profile in serum and heart lipids with specific effects on conjugated diene production and catalase activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据