4.4 Article

The effect of fish meal replacement by soyabean products on fish growth: a meta-analysis

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 102, 期 12, 页码 1709-1722

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114509991279

关键词

Fish meal; Soyabean products; Fish diets; Growth; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. University of South Bohemia Ceske Budejovice, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology (Vodnany, Czech Republic) [6007665809]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Meta-analysis was applied to quantify the effect of replacement of fish meal by soyabean products in diets on fish growth. Measurement of growth in different units among studies required the use of a standardised effect size (Hedges' d). From a total of ninety-nine studies concentrating on fish meal replacement by defatted soyabean meal, 53% were eliminated due to, among others, absence of a fish meal control diet (n 18), or no statistical differences or measurement of dispersion (n 6) indicated. Replacement of 4 to 40% fish meal by soyabean meal (inclusion levels of 71-366 g/kg) resulted in a mean effect size of -0.1142 (95% CI - 0.4665, 0.2382) obtained in forty-eight comparisons evaluated with seventeen different fish species. However, at higher fish meal replacement levels the 95% CI calculated for combined effect sizes did not overlap with zero. With soya protein concentrate replacing 25 to 100% of fish meal in diets for seven fish species, methionine supplementation (mean -2.4373 (95% CI -3.9004, -0.9742); n 10)did not have a substantial influence on the magnitude of cumulative effect sizes relative to no supplementation (mean -2.7306 (95% CI -3.7991, -1.6620); n 16). Information on other soyabean products (full-fat soyabeans, soya flour) used as protein sources in fish diets was found as too limited for analysis and definite conclusions. The present study contributes by putting a numerical value to the magnitude of growth differences in fish when replacing dietary fish meal by soyabean products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据