4.4 Article

Differential effects of dietary fatty acids on the cerebral distribution of plasma-derived apo B lipoproteins with amyloid-β

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 103, 期 5, 页码 652-662

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114509992194

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid-beta; Blood-brain barrier; SFA; TAG-rich lipoproteins

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Australian Technology Network Centre for Metabolic Fitness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some dietary fats are a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) but the mechanisms for this association are presently unknown. In the present study we showed in wild-type mice that chronic ingestion of SFA results in blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction and significant delivery into the brain of plasma proteins, including apo B lipoproteins that are endogenously enriched in amyloid-beta (A beta). Conversely, the plasma concentration of S100B was used as a marker of brain-to-blood leakage and was found to be increased two-fold because of SFA feeding. Consistent with a deterioration in BBB integrity in SFA-fed mice was a diminished cerebrovascular expression of occludin. an endothelial light junction protein. In contrast to SFA-fed mice, chronic ingestion of MUFA or PUFA had no detrimental effect on BBB integrity. Utilising highly sensitive three-dimensional immunomicroscopy, we also showed that the cerebral distribution and co-localisation of A beta with apo B lipoproteins in SFA-fed mice are similar to those found in amyloid precursor protein/presenilin-1 (APP/PSI) amyloid transgenic mice, an established murine model of AD. Moreover. there was a strong positive association of plasma-derived apo B lipoproteins with cerebral A beta deposits. Collectively, the findings of the present study provide a plausible explanation of how dietary fats may influence AD risk. Ingestion of SFA Could enhance peripheral delivery to the brain of circulating lipoprotein-A beta and exacerbate the amyloidogenic cascade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据