4.1 Article

Temporal trends in head injury outcomes from 2003 to 2009 in England and Wales

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 414-421

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2011.570882

关键词

Critical care; neurosurgery; craniocerebral trauma; cohort studies; patient transfer

资金

  1. Academy of Medical Sciences/Health Foundation
  2. MRC [G0601025] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0601025] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2008-06-001] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Case fatality rates after blunt head injury (HI) did not improve in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003. The United Kingdom National Institute of Clinical Excellence subsequently published HI management guidelines, including the recommendation that patients with severe head injuries (SHIs) should be treated in specialist neuroscience units (NSU). The aim of this study was to investigate trends in case fatality and location of care since the introduction of national HI clinical guidelines. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using prospectively recorded data from the Trauma and Audit Research Network (TARN) database for patients presenting with blunt trauma between 2003 and 2009. Temporal trends in log odds of death adjusted for case mix were examined for patients with and without HI. Location of care for patients with SHI was also studied by examining trends in the proportion of patients treated in non-NSUs. Results: Since 2003, there was an average 12% reduction in adjusted log odds of death per annum in patients with HI (n=15,173), with a similar but smaller trend in non-HI trauma mortality (n=48,681). During the study period, the proportion of patients with HI treated entirely in non-NSUs decreased from 31% to 19%, (p < 0.01). Interpretation: The reduction in odds of death following HI since 2003 is consistent with improved management following the introduction of national HI guidelines and increased treatment of SHI in NSUs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据