4.1 Article

Brain biopsy in cryptogenic neurological disease

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 614-620

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2010.551677

关键词

Brain biopsy; diagnostic yield; therapeutic impact

资金

  1. Burden Neurological Institute
  2. National Institute of Health Research
  3. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2010-25-003] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Brain biopsy is standard clinical practice when CNS malignancy is suspected. Its value has not otherwise been clearly established. We reviewed the indications for, complications and outcome of diagnostic brain biopsies performed between 2003 and 2008 in a single UK centre. Methods. Subjects were retrospectively identified using theatre log books and histopathology reports. Case records were analysed by a neurologist and neurosurgeon. Cases were excluded when the pre-operative diagnosis was clearly malignancy or infection. Results. Of all (432) brain biopsies performed, 56 were performed in 52 patients with cryptogenic neurological disease. There were no permanent deficits or deaths. Histopathological reports were classified as definitive (45%), suggestive (20%) or non-diagnostic (36%). Brain biopsy made an immediate contribution to determination of diagnosis in 55% (31 of 56) and a confident diagnosis was eventually made in 40 of 52 patients (77%). Management was altered as a consequence of biopsy in 63%. Successful biopsy of a radiologically identified target increased the proportion of biopsies considered diagnostic to 78% (odds ratio 8.9) whereas non-targeted biopsy was non-diagnostic in 71%. Although a significant proportion of patients died or had progressive disease, this was not uniformly the case; 31% stabilised and 27% improved. Conclusion. We present the highest reported frequency of brain biopsy for cryptogenic neurological disease. The risk associated with the procedure was low and the biopsy results impacted significantly upon diagnosis and management. We therefore propose that the procedure should no longer be considered one of last resort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据