4.2 Article

Interplanetary fast forward shocks and energetic storm particle events above 1.5MeV

期刊

ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 767-779

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-27-767-2009

关键词

Solar physics, astrophysics, and astronomy; Energetic particles

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [104329]
  2. Vaisala Foundation of the Finnish Academy of Science and Letters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interplanetary (IP) shock passages are usually identified by abrupt changes in the plasma parameters, but sometimes they are also associated with energetic storm particles (ESPs). The maximum observed energies of ESPs usually reach a few MeVs per nucleon and occasionally even a few hundred MeVs per nucleon. We have carried out a statistical study of ESP events observed by SOHO/ERNE above 1.5MeV during the seven-year period between May 1996 and April 2003. In the first stage, we gathered a comprehensive database of IP shock candidates using several ready-made shock lists. We defined a qualitative classification for the ESP signals and studied their association with fast forward shocks. We present a survey of the overall statistics of ESP associations with fast forward shocks and the yearly amount of the shocks and associated ESP events during the 7-year study period. Our most important findings are that only 40% of the observed interplanetary fast forward shocks accelerate ESPs to energies greater than 1.5MeV and that the high-energy ESP-effectiveness of the fast forward shocks has a solar cycle dependence. The yearly ESP-effectiveness varied from 11%, in May 1996-April 1997 (similar to activity minimum), to 53% in May 2000-April 2001 (similar to activity maximum). We also performed a quantitative analysis of the proton power law spectra at the time of the shock passage. We found that the average spectral index of ESPs was -3.6 with the standard deviation of the distribution of 1.3. The ESP events had significantly larger power law factors than the reference spectra, calculated every day at a certain time for comparison.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据