4.6 Article

SOX11 and TP53 add prognostic information to MIPI in a homogenously treated cohort of mantle cell lymphoma - a Nordic Lymphoma Group study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 166, 期 1, 页码 98-108

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12854

关键词

lymphoid malignancies; molecular diagnostics; prognostic factors

资金

  1. Lund Institute of Technology (LTH)
  2. Cancerfonden [2010/584]
  3. Vetenskapsradet, Crafoord foundation [K2012-99X-22004-01-3]
  4. BioCARE - a strategic program for Cancer Research at Lund University
  5. BioCARE - a strategic program for Cancer Research at Gothenburg University
  6. CREATE Health
  7. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF13OC0003435] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B cell lymphoma, where survival has been remarkably improved by use of protocols including high dose cytarabine, rituximab and autologous stem cell transplantation, such as the Nordic MCL2/3 protocols. In 2008, a MCL international prognostic index (MIPI) was created to enable stratification of the clinical diverse MCL patients into three risk groups. So far, use of the MIPI in clinical routine has been limited, as it has been shown that it inadequately separates low and intermediate risk group patients. To improve outcome and minimize treatment-related morbidity, additional parameters need to be evaluated to enable risk-adapted treatment selection. We have investigated the individual prognostic role of the MIPI and molecular markers including SOX11, TP53 (p53), MKI67 (Ki-67) and CCND1 (cyclin D1). Furthermore, we explored the possibility of creating an improved prognostic tool by combining the MIPI with information on molecular markers. SOX11 was shown to significantly add prognostic information to the MIPI, but in multivariate analysis TP53 was the only significant independent molecular marker. Based on these findings, we propose that TP53 and SOX11 should routinely be assessed and that a combined TP53/MIPI score may be used to guide treatment decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据