4.6 Article

Disturbed CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in paediatric precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 166, 期 2, 页码 240-249

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12883

关键词

paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; CXCR4; CXCL12; BM-MSC; Plerixafor

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [EMCR 2007-3718, EMCR 2010-4687]
  2. Sophia Foundation for Medical Research [SSWO-658]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant cells infiltrating the bone marrow (BM) interfere with normal cellular behaviour of supporting cells, thereby creating a malignant niche. We found that CXCR4-receptor expression was increased in paediatric precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP-ALL) cells compared with normal mononuclear haematopoietic cells (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, high CXCR4-expression correlated with an unfavourable outcome in BCP-ALL (5-year cumulative incidence of relapse +/- standard error: 38.4% +/- 6.9% in CXCR4-high versus 12% +/- 4.6% in CXCR4-low expressing cases, P < 0.0001). Interestingly, BM levels of the CXCR4-ligand (CXCL12) were 2.7-fold lower (P = 0.005) in diagnostic BCP-ALL samples compared with non-leukaemic controls. Induction chemotherapy restored CXCL12 levels to normal. Blocking the CXCR4-receptor with Plerixafor showed that the lower CXCL12 serum levels at diagnosis could not be explained by consumption by the leukaemic cells, nor did we observe an altered CXCL12-production capacity of BM-mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSC) at this time-point. We rather observed that a very high density of leukaemic cells negatively affected CXCL12-production by the BM-MSC while stimulating the secretion levels of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). These results suggest that highly proliferative leukaemic cells are able to down-regulate secretion of cytokines involved in homing (CXCL12), while simultaneously up-regulating those involved in haematopoietic mobilization (G-CSF). Therefore, interference with the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis may be an effective way to mobilize BCP-ALL cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据