4.6 Article

Impact of a single human leucocyte antigen (HLA) allele mismatch on the outcome of unrelated bone marrow transplantation over two time periods. A retrospective analysis of 3003 patients from the HLA Working Group of the Japan Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 161, 期 4, 页码 566-577

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12279

关键词

allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; human leucocyte antigen; graft-versus-host disease; human leucocyte antigen mismatch; unrelated donor

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A previous Japanese study revealed that a human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A or -B allele mismatch was associated with higher overall mortality, whereas an HLA-C or -DRB1 allele mismatch did not affect mortality after serologically matched unrelated bone marrow transplantation (BMT). This study reanalysed 3003 adult patients who underwent unrelated BMT from a serologically HLA-A, -B, or -DR matched unrelated donor between 1993 and 2009 using the latest database, that included 1966 HLA-matched unrelated BMT and 187, 31, 524, and 295 unrelated BMT with a single HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DRB1 allele mismatch, respectively. As opposed to our previous findings, HLA-C and -DRB1 mismatches had a significant negative impact [hazard ratio (HR) 1 center dot 35, P<0 center dot 001, and HR 1 center dot 45, P<0 center dot 001] on survival in the period 20002009. The negative impact of each single HLA allele mismatch was not significantly different among the HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 mismatches (P=0 center dot 79). An interaction test revealed that the effects of single HLA-C and -DRB1 allele mismatches significantly differed over the two time periods (P=0 center dot 032 and P=0 center dot 0072, respectively). In conclusion, the impact of a single HLA allele mismatch changed over time. In the recent cohort, the negative impact of HLA-DRB1 and -C mismatches became apparent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据