4.6 Article

Human microtubule-associated protein tau mediates targeted killing of CD30+ lymphoma cells in vitro and inhibits tumour growth in vivo

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 164, 期 2, 页码 251-257

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12626

关键词

cytolytic fusion proteins; immunotherapy; CD30; lymphoma; Ki4

资金

  1. ForSaTum project
  2. NRW-EU Ziel 2-Programm 'Regionale Wettbewerbsfahigkeit und Beschaftigung' (ERFE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) are rare lymphoproliferative cancer types. Although most HL patients can be cured by chemo- and radio-therapy, 4-50% of patients relapse and have a poor prognosis. The need for improved therapeutic options for patients with relapsed or refractory disease has been addressed by CD30-specific antibody-based immunotherapeutics. However, available CD30-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) or chimeric immunotoxins suffer from the requirement of a functional host immunity, undesirable immune reactions or heterogeneity and instability, respectively. Here, we present a new fusion protein comprised of the CD30-specific antibody single-chain fragment Ki4(scFv) and the human pro-apoptotic effector protein, microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT). Ki4(scFv)-MAP selectively induced apoptosis in rapidly proliferating L540cy, L428, and Karpas 299 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Tubulin polymerization assays confirmed that Ki4(scFv)-MAP stabilizes microtubules, suggesting a mechanism for its pro-apoptotic action. Dose-finding experiments proved that Ki4(scFv)-MAP is well tolerated in mice compared to the previously reported Ki4(scFv)-ETA'. Ki4(scFv)-MAP significantly inhibited growth of subcutaneous L540cy xenograft tumours in mice. Our data present a novel approach for the treatment of CD30(+) lymphomas, combining the binding specificity of a target-specific antibody fragment with the selective cytotoxicity of MAPT towards proliferating lymphoma cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据