4.2 Article

Dynamic Computed Tomographic Features of Adult Renal Cell Carcinoma Associated With Xp11.2 Translocation/TFE3 Gene Fusions: Comparison With Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 730-736

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000263

关键词

carcinoma; renal cell; adult; multidetector computed tomography; diagnosis; differential; in situ hybridization; fluorescence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21377052]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20131281]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20620140664]
  4. Nanjing City Young Health Personnel Training Project [QRX11178]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate the dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) characteristics of renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation and TFE gene fusion (Xp11.2 RCC) by comparison with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). Methods Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT images and clinical and pathological records of 20 adult patients with Xp11.2 RCC confirmed by TFE3 immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization assay were retrospectively analyzed and compared with the findings of 21 contemporary CCRCCs. Results Renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation and TFE gene fusions often occurred in young (30.6 8.6 years) patients with hematuria (9/20). They presented as well-defined (17/20) cystic-solid (17/20) mass with hemorrhage (8/20) and circular/rim calcifications (6/20). Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT showed heterogeneous moderate prolonged enhancement. A tumor-to-cortex attenuation ratio in corticomedullary phase less than 0.62 gave a sensitivity of 90.0% and a specificity of 92.9% in differentiating Xp11.2 RCC from CCRCC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.957, P < 0.001). Conclusions Computed tomographic characteristics and dynamic contrast-enhanced patterns and index can differentiate Xp11.2 RCC from CCRCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据