4.6 Article

Optimizing dendritic cell-based immunotherapy in multiple myeloma: intranodal injections of idiotype-pulsed CD40 ligand-matured vaccines led to induction of type-1 and cytotoxic T-cell immune responses in patients

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 150, 期 5, 页码 554-564

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08286.x

关键词

dendritic cells; idiotype; vaccination; intranodal; multiple myeloma

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [PO1 CA55819, R01 CA96569, R01 CA103978]
  2. Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation
  3. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  4. Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Vaccination with idiotype (Id) protein-pulsed dendritic cells (DCs) has been explored in multiple myeloma and the results have been disappointing. To improve the efficacy of DC vaccination in myeloma, we investigated the use of Id- and keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH)-pulsed, CD40 ligand-matured DCs administered intranodally. Nine patients with smouldering or stable myeloma without treatment were enrolled and DC vaccines were administered at weekly intervals for a total of four doses. Following vaccination, all patients mounted Id-specific gamma-interferon T-cell response. Interleukin-4 response was elicited in two, and skin delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction occurred in seven patients. More importantly, Id-specific cytotoxic T-cell responses were also detected in five patients. Most if not all patients mounted a positive T-cell response to KLH following vaccination. At 1-year follow-up, six of the nine patients had stable disease, while three patients had slowly progressive disease even during the vaccination period. At 5-year follow-up, four of the six patients continued with stable disease. No major side effects were noted. In summary, intranodal administration of Id-pulsed CD40 ligand-matured DCs was able to induce Id-specific T and B-cell responses in patients. Current efforts are geared towards breaking tumour-mediated immune suppression and improving clinical efficacy of this immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据