4.5 Article

Effectiveness of tocotrienol-rich fraction combined with tamoxifen in the management of women with early breast cancer: a pilot clinical trial

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/bcr2726

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. MPOB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Basic research has indicated that tocotrienols have potent antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects that would be expected to reduce the effect of breast cancer. Methods: We conducted a double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot trial to test the effectiveness of adjuvant tocotrienol therapy in combination with tamoxifen for 5 years in women with early breast cancer. Two-hundred-forty women, aged between 40 and 60 years, with either tumor node metastases (TNM) Stage I or II breast cancer and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors were nonrandomly assigned to two groups. The intervention group received tocotrienol-rich fraction (TRF) plus tamoxifen, whereas the control group received placebo plus tamoxifen, for 5 years. Results: During the 5 years of the study, eight patients died of breast cancer, whereas in 36 patients, a local or systemic recurrence developed. Five-year breast cancer-specific survival was 98.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 95.9% to 100%) in the intervention group and 95% (95% CI, 91.1% to 98.9%) in the control group, whereas the 5-year disease-free survival was 86.7% (95% CI, 80.6% to 92.8%) and 83.3% (95% CI, 76.6% to 90.0%), respectively. Risk of mortality due to breast cancer was 60% (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.08 to 2.05) lower in the intervention group versus the controls after adjustment for age, ethnicity, stage, and lymph node status, but this was not statistically significant. Adjuvant TRF therapy was not associated with breast cancer recurrence (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.65). Conclusions: From the current study, no association seems to exist between adjuvant tocotrienol therapy and breast cancer-specific survival in women with early breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据