4.6 Article

The anti-leukaemic activity of novel synthetic naphthoquinones against acute myeloid leukaemia: induction of cell death via the triggering of multiple signalling pathways

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 147, 期 4, 页码 459-470

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07867.x

关键词

apoptosis; mitogen-activated protein kinases; mitochondria; reactive oxygen species; TW-92

资金

  1. Lyonel Israels' Chair Fund and BGNegev Technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naphthoquinones, such as menadione, display lower toxicity than anthracyclins used in cancer chemotherapy. Novel anti-leukaemic compounds comprised of chloro-amino-phenyl naphthoquinones with substitutions on the benzoic ring were developed. Structure-activity relationship studies indicated that the analogue with both methyl and amine substitutions (named TW-92) was the most efficient in killing leukaemic cells. Treatment of U-937 promonocytic cells with TW-92 induced apoptotic or necrotic cell death, dependent on incubation and dose conditions. TW-92 induced rapid phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) and of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases (ERK1/2). The generation of apoptosis was preceded by intracellular H2O2 accumulation accompanied by glutathione depletion, the former inhibited by di-phenyl-iodonium (DPI), an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase. TW-92 induced swelling of isolated rat liver mitochondria, indicative of a direct effect on mitochondria. Apoptosis in intact cells was accompanied by a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential, cytochrome c release and caspase activation. In addition, the level of Mcl-1, an anti-apoptotic regulatory protein, was down-regulated, whereas the expression of the pro-apoptotic BAX was elevated. Finally, TW-92 exerted strong pro-apoptotic and necrotic effects in primary acute myeloid leukaemia samples when given in submicromolar concentrations. Together, these findings demonstrate that TW-92 may provide an effective anti-leukaemic strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据