4.6 Article

The impact of risk stratification by early bone-marrow response in childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trial ALL97 and ALL97/99

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 146, 期 4, 页码 424-436

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07769.x

关键词

leukaemia; childhood; clinical trials

资金

  1. UK Medical Research Council [98223452]
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U137686856, G0300130] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G0300130, MC_U137686856] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>The 1997 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) trial (ALL97) was a randomised comparison of prednisolone versus dexamethasone and of 6-mercaptopurine versus 6-thioguanine. During the first 2 years of the trial, review of survival data showed the preceding trial, UKALL XI, was no better than its predecessor and that survival for childhood ALL in the UK had not improved in the fashion witnessed by other cooperative treatment groups. The therapy template was therefore altered to an American Children's Cancer Group (CCG) style regimen, including stratification by age, white cell count and early response to therapy by assessment of the bone marrow. This phase of the trial was designated ALL97/99. Comparison of the two phases showed that the event-free survival (EFS) for both ALL97 and ALL97/99 was better than previous UKALL trials, as was overall survival (OS) for ALL97/99. Both EFS and OS were significantly better in ALL97/99 than in ALL97 (at five years, 80 center dot 0% vs. 74 center dot 0%, P = 0 center dot 002; and 88 center dot 0% vs. 83 center dot 5%, P = 0 center dot 005, respectively). Isolated central nervous system (CNS) relapse for patients in ALL97/99 was half that in ALL97 (3 center dot 0% vs. 4 center dot 9%), P = 0 center dot 03) and the overall CNS relapse rate was halved in ALL97/99 (4 center dot 4% vs. 9 center dot 6%, P < 0 center dot 00005). There were no significant differences for non-CNS relapse, induction deaths or deaths in remission between the two phases of the trial.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据