4.6 Article

Prognostic importance of T and NK-cells in a consecutive series of newly diagnosed patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 141, 期 5, 页码 607-614

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07070.x

关键词

chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; prognosis; immune system; T-cells; natural killer cells

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA94919, CA97274, CA113408, K07 CA094919, K23 CA113408, P50 CA097274] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) have a variable clinical course. The identification of modifiable characteristics related to CLL-specific survival may provide opportunities for therapeutic intervention. The absolute number of T-cell and natural killer (NK)-cells was calculated for 166 consecutive patients with CLL evaluated by flow cytometry at Mayo Clinic <= 2 months of diagnosis. The size of the T-cell/NK-cell compartment relative to the size of the malignant monoclonal B-cell (MBC) compartment was evaluated by calculating NK:MBC and T:MBC ratios. Patients exhibited substantial variation in the absolute number of T- and NK-cells as well as T:MBC and NK:MBC ratios at diagnosis. Higher T:MBC and NK:MBC ratios were observed among patients with early stage and mutated IGHV genes (all P <= 0.0003). As continuous variables, both T:MBC ratio (P-value = 0.03) and NK:MBC ratio (P-value = 0.02) were associated with time to treatment (TTT). On multivariate Cox modelling including stage, CD38, absolute MBC count, NK:MBC ratio and T:MBC ratio, the independent predictors of TTT were stage, T:MBC ratio and NK:MBC ratio. These findings suggest that measurable characteristics of the host immune system relate to the rate of disease progression in patients with newly diagnosed CLL. These characteristics can be modified and continued evaluation of immunomodulatory drugs, vaccination strategies and cellular therapies to delay/prevent disease progression are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据