4.4 Article

GP-delivered brief weight loss interventions: a cohort study of patient responses and subsequent actions, using conversation analysis in UK primary care

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
卷 68, 期 674, 页码 E646-E653

出版社

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X698405

关键词

conversation analysis; health behaviours; medical communication; primary health care

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research
  2. National Prevention Research Initiative
  3. Alzheimer's Research UK
  4. Alzheimer's Society
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  6. British Heart Foundation
  7. Cancer Research UK
  8. Chief Scientist Office
  9. Scottish Government Health Directorate
  10. Department of Health
  11. Diabetes UK
  12. Economic and Social Research Council
  13. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  14. Health and Social Care Research Division
  15. Public Health Agency
  16. Northern Ireland
  17. MRC
  18. Stroke Association
  19. Wellcome Trust
  20. Welsh Government
  21. World Cancer Research Fund [MR/J000515/1]
  22. Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  23. CLAHRC
  24. MRC [MR/J000515/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Guidelines encourage GPs to make brief opportunistic interventions to support weight loss. However, GPs fear that starting these discussions will lead to lengthy consultations. Recognising that patients are committed to take action could allow GPs to shorten brief interventions. Aim To examine which patient responses indicated commitment to action, and the time saved if these had been recognised and the consultation closed sooner. Design and setting A mixed-method cohort study of UK primary care patients participating in a trial of opportunistic weight management interventions. Method Conversation analysis was applied to 226 consultation audiorecordings to identify types of responses from patients that indicated that an offer of referral to weight management was well received. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated to examine associations between response types and likelihood of weight management programme attendance. Results Affirmative responses, for example 'yes', displayed no conversational evidence that the referral was well received and showed no association with attendance: 'yes' (OR 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.37 to 3.95, P = 0.97). However, 'oh'-prefaced responses and marked positive responses, for example 'lovely', showed conversational evidence of enthusiasm and were associated with higher odds of commercial weight management service attendance. Recognising these could have saved doctors a mean of 31 seconds per consultation. Conclusion When doctors make brief opportunistic interventions that incorporate the offer of help, 'oh'-prefaced or marked positive responses indicate enthusiastic acceptance of the offer and a higher likelihood of take-up. Recognising these responses and moving swiftly to facilitate patient action would shorten the brief intervention in many cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据