4.4 Article

Concordance between PHQ-9 scores and patients' experiences of depression: a mixed methods study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
卷 60, 期 575, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X502119

关键词

decision making; depression; qualitative research; severity of illness index

资金

  1. National Institute of Health Research [RK6871]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In 2009, a new indicator (DEP 3) was introduced into the Quality and Outcomes Framework. GPs are now encouraged to assess response to antidepressant treatment 5-12 weeks after the initial assessment, to guide clinical decision making. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is one of the validated instruments that GPs can use to assess the patient's clinical state. Aims To explore the extent to which changes in PHQ-9 score over time reflect patients' accounts of their experiences of depression during the same period; and to explore patients' experiences of using the PHQ-9 within primary care consultations. Design of study Mixed methods. Setting Primary care. Method Patients were recruited through six GP practices. The PHQ-9 and in-depth interviews were used at the same three time points over a 6-month period during a new or first episode of depression. Results Patterns in the total PHQ9 score broadly reflected patients' accounts of the severity of their depression over time. However, the PHQ-9 was inaccurate in its assessment of the presence and intensity of thoughts of self-harm, and missed symptoms that are meaningful to patients. At the diagnostic primary care consultation, patients viewed their score as a 'tangible' measure of their condition. Some patients requested the PHQ-9 subsequently as a way to measure their own treatment response and recovery process. Conclusion The potential therapeutic value of the PHQ-9 may be dependent upon the GP's willingness to openly discuss the results and what they may mean for the patient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据