4.4 Article

GPs' role in the detection of psychological problems of young people: a population-based study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
卷 59, 期 566, 页码 660-664

出版社

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X454115

关键词

access to health care; adolescence; mental health; physician-patient relationship

资金

  1. Swiss Federal Office of Public Health [00.001721/2.24.02.-81]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Among young people, about one in three females and one in five males report experiencing emotional distress but 65-95% of them do not receive help from health professionals. Aim To assess the differences among young people who seek help and those who do not seek help for their psychological problems, considering the frequency of consultations to their GP and their social resources. Design of study School survey. Setting Post-mandatory school. Method Among a Swiss national representative sample of 7429 students and apprentices (45.6% females) aged 16-20 years, 1931 young people reported needing help for a problem of depression/sadness (26%) and were included in the study. They were divided into those who sought help (n = 256) and those who did not (n 1675), and differences between them were assessed. Results Only 13% of young people needing help for psychological problems consulted for that reason and this rate was positively associated with the frequency of consultations to the GP. However, 80% of young people who did not consult for psychological problems visited their GP at least once during the previous year. Being older or a student, having a higher depression score, or a history of suicide attempt were linked with a higher rate of help seeking. Moreover, confiding in adults positively influenced the rate of help seeking. Conclusion The large majority of young people reporting psychological problems do not seek help, although they regularly consult their GP. While young people have difficulties in tackling issues about mental health, GPs could improve the situation by systematically inquiring about this issue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据