4.6 Article

Founder mutation in dystonin-e underlying autosomal recessive epidermolysis bullosa simplex in Kuwait

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 172, 期 2, 页码 527-531

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13294

关键词

-

资金

  1. DebRA U.K.
  2. Department of Health via the U.K. National Institute for Health Research Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  3. King's College London
  4. King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  5. Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation [4314]
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [S2404]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26670526, 23591617] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Only two homozygous nonsense mutations in the epidermal isoform of the dystonin gene, DST-e, have been reported previously in autosomal recessive epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS); the affected pedigrees were Kuwaiti and Iranian. This subtype of EBS is therefore considered to be a rare clinicopathological entity. In this study, we identified four seemingly unrelated Kuwaiti families in which a total of seven individuals had predominantly acral trauma-induced blistering since infancy. All affected individuals were homozygous for the mutation p.Gln1124* in DST-e, the same mutation that was identified in the originally reported family from Kuwait. Haplotype analysis in the five pedigrees (including the previous case) revealed a shared block of similar to 60 kb of genomic DNA across the site of the mutation, consistent with a founder effect. Most heterozygotes had no clinical abnormalities although one subject had mild transient skin fragility during childhood, an observation noted in the previously reported Iranian pedigree, suggesting that the condition may also be semidominant in some pedigrees rather than purely autosomal recessive. Our study reveals propagation of a mutant ancestral allele in DST-e throughout Kuwait, indicating that this subtype of EBS may be more common in Kuwait, and perhaps other Middle Eastern countries, than is currently appreciated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据