4.6 Article

Comparative proteomic analysis between normal skin and keloid scar

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 162, 期 6, 页码 1302-1315

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09660.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biomedical Research Council, Singapore [03/1/21/19/251, 04/1/21/19/338, 05/1/21/19/390, 06/1/21/19/442]
  2. National Medical Research Council, Singapore [NMRC/1026/2005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Keloids are pathological scars and, despite numerous available treatment modalities, continue to plague physicians and patients. Objectives Identification of molecular mediators that contribute to this fibrotic phenotype. Methods Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, MALDI-TOF, Mascot online database searching algorithm and Melanie 5 gel analysis software were employed for comparative proteomic analysis between normal skin (NS) and keloid scar (KS) tissue extracts. Results Seventy-nine protein spots corresponding to 23 and 32 differentially expressed proteins were identified in NS and KS, respectively. Isoforms of heat shock proteins, gelsolin, carbonic anhydrase and notably keratin 10 were strongly expressed in NS along with manganese superoxide dismutase, immune components, antitrypsin, prostatic binding protein and crystalline. Various classes of proteins were found either to be present or to be upregulated in keloid tissue: (i) inflammatory/differentiated keratinocyte markers: S100 proteins, peroxiredoxin I; (ii) wound healing proteins: gelsolin-like capping protein; (iii) fibrogenetic proteins: mast cell beta-tryptase, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF); (iv) antifibrotic proteins: asporin; (v) tumour suppressor proteins: stratifin, galectin-1, maspin; and (vi) antiangiogenic proteins: pigment epithelium-derived factor. Significant increases in expression of asporin, stratifin, galectin-1 and MIF were observed by Western blot analysis in KS. Conclusions This work has identified differentially expressed proteins specific to KS tissue extracts which can potentially be used as specific targets for therapeutic intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据