4.8 Article

Simultaneous Imaging of Zn2+ and Cu2+ in Living Cells Based on DNAzyme Modified Gold Nanoparticle

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 87, 期 9, 页码 4829-4835

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00204

关键词

-

资金

  1. 973 Program [2013CB933800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21227005, 21390411, 91313302, 21205074]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20123704120006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trace Zn2+ and Cu2+ in living cells play important roles in the regulation of biological function. It is significant to simultaneously detect the cellular Zn2+ and Cu2+. Here, we present a novel two-color fluorescence nanoprobe based on the DNAzymes for simultaneous imaging of Zn2+ and Cu2+ in living cells. The probe consists of a 13 nm gold nanoparticle, DNAzymes that are specific for Zn2+ and Cu2+, and the substrate strands labeled with fluorophores at the 5' end and quenchers at the 3' end. The fluorescence of the fluoreophores is quenched both by the gold nanoparticle and the quencher. After the nanoprobes are transferred into the cells, the substrate strands would be cleaved in the presence of the Zn2+ and Cu2+ target, resulting in disassociation of the shorter DNA fragments containing fluorophores, which produce fluorescence signals correlated with the location and concentration of the Zn2+ and Cu2+. The nanoprobe exhibits high specificity, nuclease stability, and good biocompatibility. Moreover, the nanoprobe can simultaneously monitor the cellular Zn2+ and Cu2+ with an on-site manner, providing the information on localization and concentration of targets, which is significant to further research the Zn2+- and Cu2+-relative cellular events and biological process. The proposed method has shown great potential in the detection of multiple metal ions in living cells, which may help us to better understand the function of metal ions in the fields of biochemistry, molecular biology, and cellular toxicology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据