4.5 Article

Surinabant, a selective cannabinoid receptor type 1 antagonist, inhibits 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced central nervous system and heart rate effects in humans

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 76, 期 1, 页码 65-77

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12071

关键词

CB1 receptor antagonist; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; PK-PD modelling; SR147778; surinabant

资金

  1. Sanofi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim Cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) antagonists have been developed for the treatment of obesity and associated risk factors. Surinabant is a high affinity CB1 antagonist in vitro. The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude of inhibition by surinabant of CNS effects and heart rate induced by 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in humans. Methods This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, four period six sequence crossover study. Thirty healthy young male occasional cannabis users (<1 per week) were included. A single oral dose of surinabant (5, 20 or 60mg) or placebo was administered followed 1.5h later by four intrapulmonary THC doses (2, 4, 6 and 6mg) or vehicle, administered at 1h intervals. The wash-out period was 14-21 days. Subjective and objective pharmacodynamic (PD) measurements were performed. A population PK-PD model for THC and surinabant quantified PK and PD effects. Results Surinabant 20 and 60mg inhibited all THC-induced PD effects in a similar range for both doses with inhibition ratios ranging from 68.3% (95% CI = 32.5, 104.2; heart rate) to 91.1% (95% CI = 30.3, 151.8; body sway). IC50 ranged from 22.0ngml-1 [relative standard error (RSE) = 45.2%; body sway] to 58.8ngml-1 (RSE = 44.2%; internal perception). Surinabant 5mg demonstrated no significant effects. Conclusions The dose-related inhibition by surinabant, without any effect of its own, suggests that this compound behaves as a CB1 receptor antagonist in humans at these concentrations. A single surinabant dose between 5 to 20mg and above was able to antagonize THC-induced effects in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据