4.5 Article

Anti-platelet therapy: cyclo-oxygenase inhibition and the use of aspirin with particular regard to dual anti-platelet therapy

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 72, 期 4, 页码 619-633

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03943.x

关键词

prostaglandins; thienopyridines; thrombosis; thromboxane A(2)

资金

  1. AstraZeneca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aspirin and P2Y(12) antagonists are commonly used anti-platelet agents. Aspirin produces its effects through inhibition of thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) production, while P2Y(12) antagonists attenuate the secondary responses to ADP released by activated platelets. The anti-platelet effects of aspirin and a P2Y(12) antagonist are often considered to be separately additive. However, there is evidence of an overlap in effects, in that a high level of P2Y(12) receptor inhibition can blunt TXA(2) receptor signalling in platelets and reduce platelet production of TXA(2). Against this background, the addition of aspirin, particularly at higher doses, could cause significant reductions in the production of prostanoids in other tissues, e. g. prostaglandin I-2 from the blood vessel wall. This review summarizes the data from clinical studies in which dose-dependent effects of aspirin on prostanoid production have been evaluated by both plasma and urinary measures. It also addresses the biology underlying the cardiovascular effects of aspirin and its influences upon prostanoid production throughout the body. The review then considers whether, in the presence of newer, more refined P2Y(12) receptor antagonists, aspirin may offer less benefit than might have been predicted from earlier clinical trials using more variable P2Y(12) antagonists. The possibility is reflected upon, that when combined with a high level of P2Y(12) blockade the net effect of higher doses of aspirin could be removal of anti-thrombotic and vasodilating prostanoids and so a lessening of the anti-thrombotic effectiveness of the treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据