4.5 Article

Altered xanthine oxidase and N-acetyltransferase activity in obese children

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 109-115

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03959.x

关键词

caffeine; drug metabolism; obesity; paediatric

资金

  1. Children's Cancer Research Fund Minneapolis, MN
  2. American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education
  3. NIH [K12 HD052187-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIMS It is well established that oxidative and conjugative enzyme activity differs between obese and healthy-weight adults. However, the effect of obesity on drug metabolism in children has not been studied extensively. This study examined whether obese and healthy-weight children vary with respect to oxidative enzyme activity of CYP1A2, xanthine oxidase (XO) and conjugative enzyme activity of N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2). METHODS In vivo CYP1A2, XO and NAT2 activity was assessed in obese (n = 9) and lean (n = 16) children between the ages of 6-10 years using caffeine (118.3 ml Coca Cola (R)) as probe. Urine samples were collected in 2-h increments over 8 h. Caffeine and metabolites were measured using LC/MS, and urinary metabolic ratios were determined based on reported methods. RESULTS Sixteen healthy-weight and nine obese children were evaluated. XO activity was elevated in paediatric obese volunteers compared with non-obese paediatric volunteers (XO metabolic ratio of 0.7 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.06, respectively, 95% CI 0.046, 0.154, P < 0.001). NAT2 activity was fivefold higher in the obese (1 +/- 0.4) as compared with non-obese children (0.2 +/- 0.1), 95% CI 0.26, 1.34, P < 0.05. However, no difference was observed in CYP1A2 activity between the groups (95% CI-2.72, 0.12, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence that obese children have elevated XO and NAT2 enzyme activity when compared with healthy-weight controls. Further studies are needed to determine how this may impact the efficacy of therapeutic agents that may undergo metabolism by these enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据