4.5 Article

An investigation of the safety and pharmacokinetics of the novel TRPV1 antagonist XEN-D0501 in healthy subjects

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 72, 期 6, 页码 921-931

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04040.x

关键词

overactive bladder; TRPV1 antagonist; XEN-D0501

资金

  1. Xention Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIMS XEN-D0501, a novel TRPV1 antagonist, is being developed to treat overactive bladder. This study investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of repeat-dose XEN-D0501 in healthy subjects. METHODS The study was conducted in two parts. Part 1 was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in three cohorts of 12 young male subjects. Each subject received XEN-D0501 and placebo (in random order) twice daily for 13 days, with a final single dose on day 14. Doses of 1, 2.5 and 5mg XEN-D0501 were investigated. Part 2 was an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study in male and female subjects (45 to 65 years). Subjects received single doses of 5mg XEN-D0501 under fasted and fed conditions in random order. Blood sampling and safety assessments were conducted throughout the study. RESULTS XEN-D0501 was rapidly absorbed (t(max) generally 0.5-4 h post dose). XEN-D0501 exposure increased less than proportionally to dose over the range studied and exhibited minimal accumulation with twice daily dosing. Food had no clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics of XEN-D0501. There were no severe or serious adverse events and all doses were well tolerated. A dose-related increase in body temperature was seen with XEN-D0501 which attenuated over time. Differences from placebo in mean maximum core body temperatures were 0.22 degrees C, 0.5 degrees C and 0.74 degrees C following 1 mg, 2.5 mg and 5mg twice daily XEN-D0501. The observed increase in body temperature was not considered to be of clinical concern. CONCLUSIONS XEN-D0501 appeared safe and well tolerated at doses up to 5mg twice daily for 14 days in healthy subjects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据