4.5 Article

Population pharmacokinetics of chloroquine and sulfadoxine and treatment response in children with malaria: suggestions for an improved dose regimen

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 493-501

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03050.x

关键词

chloroquine; falciparum malaria; increased dose proposal; population pharmacokinetics; sulfadoxine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIMS To describe the pharmacokinetics of chloroquine (CQ) and sulfadoxine (SDx), and to identify predictors of treatment response in children with malaria given the CQ + SDx and pyrimethamine (PYR) combination. METHODS Eighty-six Ugandan children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria, 6 months to 5 years old, were randomly treated with prepacked fixed-dose CQ + SDx/PYR. The youngest children (< 24 months) received half strength and the older (> 24 months) full strength treatment. The reported day 14 failure rates were 48% and 18%, respectively. Capillary blood (100 mu l) applied on to filter paper was collected on eight occasions during 28 days of follow up. Concentrations of CQ and SDx were determined. A population approach was used for the pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS A two-compartment model adequately described the data for both CQ and SDx. For CQ, the typical apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V-C/F) values were estimated to be 2.84 l h(-1) and 230 l. The typical CL/F for SDx was 0.023 l h(-1), while the factor relating its V-C/F to normalized body weight was 1.6 l kg(-1). Post hoc parameter estimates for both drugs showed lower maximum concentrations (C-max) and concentration-time curve areas (AUC(0,336 h)) in younger children. The AUC(0,336 h) for SDx and CQ were independently significant factors for prediction of cure. Simulations suggest that giving the higher dose to the youngest children would result in higher CQ and SDx concentrations and improved outcome. CONCLUSIONS The study results suggest that full-strength combination to all children would improve the cure rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据