4.5 Article

Target concentration intervention is needed for tobramycin dosing in paediatric patients with cystic fibrosis - a population pharmacokinetic study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 502-510

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03045.x

关键词

cystic fibrosis; paediatrics; population pharmacokinetics; target concentration intervention; tobramycin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM The primary aim was to estimate the population pharmacokinetic parameters of once-daily intravenous (i.v.) tobramycin in paediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and to investigate the influence of covariates. The second aim was to assess the need for target concentration intervention (TCI) for tobramycin in this patient group. METHODS Retrospective demographic, dosing and concentration data were collected from 35 CF patients (21 female, 14 male) aged 0.5-17.8 years, from whom 318 tobramycin plasma concentrations were available. NONMEM was used to estimate the population pharmacokinetics of tobramycin. Simulations were performed using weight-based dosing with a weight from a covariate distribution model to evaluated current dosing schedules and monitoring practices. RESULTS A two-compartment model best described the data with population parameter estimates for clearance of central compartment (CL) of 6.37 l h(-1) per 70 kg; volume of central compartment (V-c) of 18.7 l per 70 kg; intercompartmental clearance (Q) of 0.393 l h(-1); and volume of peripheral compartment (V-per) of 1.32 l. The inclusion of total body weight as covariate reduced the random component of between-subject variability in CL from 50.1% to 11.7% and in V-c from 62.2% to 11.6%. The between-occasion variability on CL was estimated in the final model as 6.5%. Simulations show that one dose does not fit all and TCI and dose adjustment are required. CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first pharmacokinetic model of once-daily i.v. tobramycin for the use of target concentration intervention in paediatric CF patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据