4.7 Article

Correlation between human papillomavirus and p16 overexpression in oropharyngeal tumours: a systematic review

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 110, 期 6, 页码 1587-1594

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.42

关键词

p16; hpv; oropharyngeal tumours; head and neck tumours; human papillomavirus; p16ink4a

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A significant proportion of squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx (OP-SCC) are related to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and p16 overexpression. This subgroup proves better prognosis and survival but no evidence exists on the correlation between HPV and p16 overexpression based on diagnostic measures and definition of p16 overexpression. We evaluated means of p16 and HPV diagnostics, and quantified overexpression of p16 in HPV-positive and -negative OP-SCCs by mode of immunohistochemical staining of carcinoma cells. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from 1980 until October 2012. We applied the following inclusion criteria: a minimum of 20 cases of site-specific OP-SCCs, and HPV and p16 results present. Studies were categorised into three groups based on their definition of p16 overexpression: verbal definition, nuclear and cytoplasmatic staining between 5 and 69%, and >= 70% staining. Results: We identified 39 studies with available outcome data (n = 3926): 22 studies (n = 1980) used PCR, 6 studies (n = 688) used ISH, and 11 studies (n = 1258) used both PCR and ISH for HPV diagnostics. The methods showed similar HPV-positive results. Overall, 52.5% of the cases (n = 2062) were HPV positive. As to p16 overexpression, 17 studies (n = 1684) used a minimum of 5-69% staining, and 7 studies (n = 764) used >= 70% staining. Fifteen studies (n = 1478) referred to a verbal definition. Studies showed high heterogeneity in diagnostics of HPV and definition of p16. The correlation between HPV positivity and p16 overexpression proved best numerically in the group applying >= 70% staining for p16 overexpression. The group with verbal definitions had a significantly lower false-positive rate, but along with the group applying 5-69% staining showed a worse sensitivity compared with >= 70% staining. Conclusions: There are substantial differences in how studies diagnose HPV and define p16 overexpression. Numerically, p16 staining is better to predict the presence of HPV (i.e. larger sensitivity), when the cutoff is set at >= 70% of cytoplasmatic and nuclear staining.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据