4.7 Article

Focal amplification of the androgen receptor gene in hormone-naive human prostate cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 110, 期 6, 页码 1655-1662

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.13

关键词

androgen receptor gene amplification; FISH; hormone naive; prostate cancer prognosis

类别

资金

  1. International Association of Cancer research
  2. Bob Champion Cancer Trust
  3. Grand Charity of Freemasons
  4. Big C Cancer Charity
  5. Orchid and Prostate Cancer UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Androgen receptor (AR)-gene amplification, found in 20-30% of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPCa) is proposed to develop as a consequence of hormone-deprivation therapy and be a prime cause of treatment failure. Here we investigate AR-gene amplification in cancers before hormone deprivation therapy. Methods: A tissue microarray (TMA) series of 596 hormone-naive prostate cancers (HNPCas) was screened for chromosome X and AR-gene locus-specific copy number alterations using four-colour fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Results: Both high level gain in chromosome X (>= 4 fold; n =4, 0.7%) and locus-specific amplification of the AR-gene (n =6, 1%) were detected at low frequencies in HNPCa TMAs. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation mapping whole sections taken from the original HNPCa specimen blocks demonstrated that AR-gene amplifications exist in small foci of cells (<= 600 nm, <= 1% of tumour volume). Patients with AR gene-locus-specific copy number gains had poorer prostate cancer-specific survival. Conclusion: Small clonal foci of cancer containing high level gain of the androgen receptor (AR)-gene develop before hormone deprivation therapy. Their small size makes detection by TMA inefficient and suggests a higher prevalence than that reported herein. It is hypothesised that a large proportion of AR-amplified CRPCa could pre-date hormone deprivation therapy and that these patients would potentially benefit from early total androgen ablation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据