4.7 Article

A nested case-control study of adjuvant hormonal therapy persistence and compliance, and early breast cancer recurrence in women with stage I-III breast cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 109, 期 6, 页码 1513-1521

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.518

关键词

breast cancer; recurrence; hormonal therapy; compliance; persistence; adherence

类别

资金

  1. Health Research Board Ireland [HRA-2009-221, ICE-2011-9]
  2. Health Research Board (HRB) [HRA-2009-221, ICE-2011-9] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Non-persistence and non-compliance are common in women prescribed hormonal therapy for breast cancer, but little is known about their influence on recurrence. Methods: A nested case-control study of associations between hormonal therapy non-persistence and non-compliance and the risk of early recurrence in women with stage I-III breast cancer was undertaken. Cases, defined as women with a breast cancer recurrence within 4 years of hormonal therapy initiation, were matched to controls (1 : 5) by tumour stage and age. Conditional logistic regression was used to examine associations between early recurrence and hormonal therapy non-persistence and noncompliance. Results: Ninety-four women with breast cancer recurrence were matched to 458 controls. Women who were non-persistent (>= 180 days without hormonal therapy) had a significantly increased adjusted recurrence odds ratio (OR) of 2.88 (95% CI 1.11, 7.46) compared with persistent women. There was no significant association between low compliance (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.74, 2.30) and breast cancer recurrence. Conclusion: Hormonal therapy non-persistence is associated with a significantly higher risk of early recurrence in women with stage I-III oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. This finding is consistent with results from randomized studies of hormonal therapy treatment duration and suggests that interventions to target modifiable risk factors for non-persistence are required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据