4.7 Article

The tumour suppressor miR-34c targets MET in prostate cancer cells

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 109, 期 5, 页码 1271-1278

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.449

关键词

microRNA; miR-34c; MET; prostate cancer; androgen receptor; c-met

类别

资金

  1. European Union [201438]
  2. Swedish Research council
  3. Swedish Research council, Gunnar Nilssons Cancer foundation
  4. Jeanssons foundation
  5. Gyllenstiernska Krapperups foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The microRNA, miR-34c, is a well-established regulator of tumour suppression. It is downregulated in most forms of cancers and inhibits malignant growth by repressing genes involved in processes such as proliferation, anti-apoptosis, stemness, and migration. We have previously reported downregulation and tumour suppressive properties for miR-34c in prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: In this study, we set out to further characterize the mechanisms by which miR-34c deregulation contributes to PCa progression. The genes regulated by miR-34c in the PCa cell line PC3 were identified by microarray analyses and were found to be enriched in cell death, cell cycle, cellular growth, and cellular movement pathways. One of the identified targets was MET, a receptor tyrosine kinase activated by hepatocyte growth factor, that is crucial for metastatic progression. Results: We confirmed the inhibitory effect of miR-34c on both MET transcript and protein levels. The binding of miR-34c to two binding sites in the 3'-UTR of MET was validated using luciferase reporter assays and target site blockers. The effect of this regulation on the miR-34c inhibition of the migratory phenotype was also confirmed. In addition, a significant inverse correlation between miR-34c expression levels and MET immunostaining was found in PCa patients. Conclusion: These findings provide a novel molecular mechanism of MET regulation in PCa and contribute to the increasing evidence that miR-34c has a key tumour suppressive role in PCa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据