4.7 Article

Concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 and pancreatic cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 106, 期 5, 页码 1004-1010

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.19

关键词

IGF-I; IGFBP-3; pancreatic cancer; cohort study

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [793]
  2. European Commission (DG-SANCO)
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer
  4. Danish Cancer Society (Denmark)
  5. LigueContre le Cancer
  6. InstitutGustaveRoussy
  7. MutuelleGenerale de l'EducationNationale
  8. Institut National de la Sante et de la RechercheMedicale (INSERM
  9. France)
  10. Deutsche Krebshilfe
  11. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ)
  12. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
  13. Ministry of Health and Social Solidarity
  14. Stavros Niarchos Foundation
  15. Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece)
  16. Italian Association for Research on Cancer (AIRC)
  17. National Research Council (Italy)
  18. Dutch Ministry of Public Health
  19. Welfare and Sports (VWS)
  20. Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR)
  21. LK Research Funds
  22. Dutch Prevention Funds
  23. Dutch ZON (ZorgOnderzoek Nederland)
  24. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)
  25. Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands)
  26. Nordforsk
  27. Nordic Centre of Excellence Programme on Food, Nutrition and Health (Norway)
  28. Health Research Fund (FIS)
  29. Regional Governments of Andalucia
  30. Asturias
  31. Basque Country
  32. Murcia and Navarra
  33. ISCIII RETIC (Spain) [RD06/0020]
  34. Swedish Cancer Society
  35. Swedish Scientific Council
  36. Regional Government of Skane and Vasterbotten (Sweden)
  37. Cancer Research UK
  38. Medical Research Council
  39. Stroke Association
  40. British Heart Foundation
  41. Department of Health, Food Standards Agency
  42. Wellcome Trust (United Kingdom)
  43. [ERC-2009-AdG 232997]
  44. Cancer Research UK [14136] Funding Source: researchfish
  45. Medical Research Council [MC_U106179471, G0801056B, G0401527, G1000143] Funding Source: researchfish
  46. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF10OC1013267] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and their binding proteins (BPs) regulate cell differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis, and may have a role in the aetiology of various cancers. Information on their role in pancreatic cancer is limited and was examined here in a case-control study nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. METHODS: Serum concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in 422 cases and 422 controls matched on age, sex, study centre, recruitment date, and time since last meal. Conditional logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for confounding variables. RESULTS: Neither circulating levels of IGF-I (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.75-1.93 for top vs bottom quartile, P-trend 0.301), IGFBP-3 (OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.66-1.51, P-trend 0.79), nor the molar IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio, an indicator of free IGF-I level (OR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.75-1.97, P-trend 0.27), were statistically significantly associated with the risk of pancreatic cancer. In a cross-classification, however, a high concentration of IGF-I with concurrently low levels of IGFBP-3 was related to an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.05-2.83; P-interaction = 0.154). CONCLUSION: On the basis of these results, circulating levels of components of the IGF axis do not appear to be the risk factors for pancreatic cancer. However, on the basis of the results of a subanalysis, it cannot be excluded that a relatively large amount of IGF-1 together with very low levels of IGFBP-3 might still be associated with an increase in pancreatic cancer risk. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 106, 1004-1010. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.19 www.bjcancer.com Published online 7 February 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据