4.7 Article

Calprotectin: a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of pleural effusion

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 107, 期 11, 页码 1876-1882

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.478

关键词

malignant PE; diagnosis; accuracy; calprotectin

类别

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (FIS) of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spain) [PS09-00405]
  2. Xunta de Galicia
  3. FEDER [CN 2011/024]
  4. Programa Nacional de Formacion de Profesorado Universitario (FPU, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Novel non-invasive biomarkers for the precise diagnosis of malignancy in pleural effusion (PE) are needed. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of calprotectin for predicting malignancy in patients with exudative PE. METHODS: Calprotectin concentration was measured in 156 individuals diagnosed with exudative PE (67 malignant and 89 benign). Calprotectin accuracy for discriminating between malignant and benign PE was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to test the association between calprotectin levels and malignant PE. RESULTS: Calprotectin levels were significantly lower in malignant pleural fluid (257.2 ng ml(-1), range: 90.7-736.4) than benign effusions (2627.1 ng ml(-1), range: 21-9530.1). The area under the curve was 0.963. A cutoff point of <= 736.4 ng ml(-1) rendered a sensitivity of 100%, with a specificity of 83.15%, which could prove useful to delimit those patients with negative cytology tests that should be referred for more invasive diagnostic procedures. Logistic regression demonstrated a strong association between calprotectin and malignancy (adjusted OR 663.14). CONCLUSION: Calprotectin predicts malignancy in pleural fluid with high accuracy and could be a good complement to cytological methods. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 1876-1882. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.478 www.bjcancer.com Published online 23 October 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据