4.7 Article

The tumour-suppressive function of miR-1 and miR-133a targeting TAGLN2 in bladder cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 104, 期 5, 页码 808-818

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.23

关键词

TAGLN2; microRNA; miR-1; miR-133a; bladder cancer

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture [20390427, 20591861]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20591861, 20390427] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: On the base of the microRNA (miRNA) expression signature of bladder cancer (BC), we found that miR-1 and miR-133a were significantly downregulated in BC. In this study, we focussed on the functional significance of miR-1 and miR-133a in BC cell lines and identified a molecular network of these miRNAs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated the miRNA expression signature of BC clinical specimens and identified several downregulated miRNAs (miR-133a, miR-204, miR-1, miR-139-5p, and miR-370). MiR-1 and miR-133a showed potential role of tumour suppressors by functional analyses of BC cells such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion assays. Molecular target searches of these miRNAs showed that transgelin 2 (TAGLN2) was directly regulated by both miR-1 and miR-133a. Silencing of TAGLN2 study demonstrated significant inhibitions of cell proliferation and increase of apoptosis in BC cell lines. The immunohistochemistry showed a positive correlation between TAGLN2 expression and tumour grade in clinical BC specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The downregulation of miR-1 and miR-133a was a frequent event in BC, and these miRNAs were recognised as tumour suppressive. TAGLN2 may be a target of both miRNAs and had a potential oncogenic function. Therefore, novel molecular networks provided by miRNAs may provide new insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of BC. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 104, 808-818. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.23 www.bjcancer.com Published online 8 February 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据