4.7 Article

Expression and prognostic value of transcription factor PROX1 in colorectal cancer

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 105, 期 9, 页码 1346-1351

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.297

关键词

prospero-related homeobox gene; PROX1; colorectal cancer; expression; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Finnish Cancer Society
  3. Finska Lakaresallskapet
  4. Medicinska understodsforeningen Liv och Halsa
  5. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  6. Helsinki University Central Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: PROX1 is a specific target of the beta-catenin/TCF pathway in the intestinal epithelium. It acts as a regulator of progression from a benign to a highly dysplastic phenotype in colorectal tumours. However, the clinical significance of PROX1 expression is not known. METHODS: We studied the prognostic value of immunohistochemical expression of PROX1 in a series of 517 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). RESULTS: The majority of the tumour samples expressed PROX1 (91%, 471 out of 517). High PROX1 expression was associated with a poor grade of tumour differentiation (P<0.0001). In the subgroup of patients with colon cancer, high PROX1 expression was associated with unfavourable colorectal cancer-specific survival (CCSS) as compared with low PROX1 expression (CCSS 47% vs 62%; P = 0.045; RR 1.47). The association between high PROX1 and poor outcome was further strengthened in female colon cancer patients (CCSS 38% vs 63%; P = 0.007; RR 2.02). Nonetheless, in multivariate survival analysis PROX1 expression was not retained as an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: High PROX1 expression is associated with a poor grade of tumour differentiation, and, in colon cancer patients, also with less favourable patient outcome. Our results strengthen the previous preclinical observations that PROX1 has a role in tumour progression in CRC. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 1346-1351. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.297 www.bjcancer.com Published online 4 October 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据