4.7 Article

Anti-tumour activity of afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, in human pancreatic tumour cells

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 105, 期 10, 页码 1554-1562

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.396

关键词

afatinib; erlotinib; ICR62; pancreatic cancer

类别

资金

  1. Kingston University London
  2. Ralph Bates Pancreatic Cancer Research fund
  3. Cancer Vaccine Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The combination of the reversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erlotinib with gemcitabine obtained FDA approval for treating patients with pancreatic cancer. However, duration of response is often limited and there is currently no reliable predictive marker. METHODS: We determined the sensitivity of a panel of human pancreatic tumour cell lines to treatment with afatinib, erlotinib, monoclonal antibody (mAb) ICR62, and gemcitabine, using the Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay. The effect of these agents on cell signalling and cell-cycle distribution was determined by western blot and flow cytometry, respectively. RESULTS: At 200 nM, ICR62 had no effect on growth of these tumour cells with the exception of BxPC-3 cells. BxPC-3 cells were also sensitive to treatment with afatinib and erlotinib with respective IC50 values of 11 and 1200 nM. Compared with erlotinib, afatinib was also more effective in inhibiting the growth of the other human pancreatic tumour cell lines and in blocking the EGF-induced phosphorylation of tyrosine, EGFR, MAPK, and AKT. When tested in BxPC-3 xenografts, afatinib induced significant delay in tumour growth. CONCLUSION: The superiority of afatinib in this study encourages further investigation on the therapeutic potential of afatinib as a single agent or in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 1554-1562. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.396 www.bjcancer.com Published online 4 October 2011 (C) 2011 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据