4.7 Article

A pilot study to explore circulating tumour cells in pancreatic cancer as a novel biomarker

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 106, 期 3, 页码 508-516

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.545

关键词

circulating tumour cells; circulating tumour microemboli; pancreatic cancer; ISET; CellSearch; tumour biopsy

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK
  2. AstraZeneca Ltd [c147/A12328a]
  3. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2011-06-002] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Obtaining tissue for pancreatic carcinoma diagnosis and biomarker assessment to aid drug development is challenging. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) may represent a potential biomarker to address these unmet needs. We compared prospectively the utility of two platforms for CTC enumeration and characterisation in pancreatic cancer patients in a pilot exploratory study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood samples were obtained prospectively from 54 consenting patients and analysed by CellSearch and isolation by size of epithelial tumour cells (ISET). CellSearch exploits immunomagnetic capture of CTCs-expressing epithelial markers, whereas ISET is a marker independent, blood filtration device. Circulating tumour cell expression of epithelial and mesenchymal markers was assessed to explore any discrepancy in CTC number between the two platforms. RESULTS: ISET detected CTCs in more patients than CellSearch (93% vs 40%) and in higher numbers (median CTCs/7.5 ml, 9 (range 0-240) vs 0 (range 0-144)). Heterogeneity observed for epithelial cell adhesion molecule, pan-cytokeratin (CK), E-Cadherin, Vimentin and CK 7 expression in CTCs may account for discrepancy in CTC number between platforms. CONCLUSION: ISET detects more CTCs than CellSearch and offers flexible CTC characterisation with potential to investigate CTC biology and develop biomarkers for pancreatic cancer patient management. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 106, 508-516. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.545 www.bjcancer.com Published online 20 December 2011 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据